Tennis Match Fixing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Tennis Match Fixing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Tennis <span id="more-35808"></span>Match Fixing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Few would accuse anybody of match fixing at Wimbledon, but many say that the practice is extensive among lower-ranked players at smaller events.

Tennis is confronted with accusations of match fixing for years: through the match that is infamous Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much for the public to questions concerning the integrity of matches in some smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, there always generally seems to be something lurking under the sport’s surface.

Those concerns were aired once more this week in a tale by The Daily Beast, which again attempted to delve through the information and knowledge out here about tennis and figure out simply how much of a problem match fixing is for the sport.

One 2014 research cited in that story estimated that one percent of most tournament that is first-round might be fixed, which may mean more than 20 matches a year were affected by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have actually suggested that multiple matches per week could be fixed, though that’s nevertheless a very small percentage of all expert tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

What makes tennis so vulnerable to match fixing?

There are certainly a mix of factors, many of which help explain why the situation seems most prominent during the lower levels of this professional ranks.

First, there’s well-known fact that tennis (at least in singles play) is an individual sport.

There is certainly only one individual which should be bribed in order to get them to throw a match (the same issue leading many to worry widespread integrity issues in boxing and other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to pick the slack up for a player who is struggling.

That said, nobody is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.

For one, there’s the very fact that these matches have a rigorous quantity of scrutiny if it could be done at all on them; perhaps even more importantly, though, star tennis players are extremely well compensated, meaning it would cost anyone attempting to fix a match at that level an exorbitant amount of money.

That is not to say that no body attempts. Even Novak Djokovic has told an account of being offered $100,000 to fix a match back 2006.

But players on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors aren’t making nearly that much money, and could even lose money in a given tournament after travel and mentoring expenses are taken under consideration.

That produces them prime targets for gamblers trying to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Repairing Without Impacting Match Result

Another problem is the fact that gamblers do not also have to fix a match that is entire find ways to benefit.

Because many gambling web sites and bookmakers offer wagering on sets or even individual games, players can reach agreements allowing certain events to happen at the right times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.

‘One particular common fix would be to divide the very first two sets to a predetermined script, then have fun with the 3rd set fairly to figure out which player advances,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this year.

The Tennis Integrity Unit is the body tasked with rooting out such dilemmas, and they have actually often made examples of players. Each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption rules, though not for match-fixing in March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, it’s unlikely in order to alter the culture enabling lower-ranked players to be incentivized to help gamblers who wish to make bets that are sure.

That would need a complete change in how compensation works up and down the various amounts of professional tennis, something that probably won’t take place any moment quickly.

New Jersey Online DDoS Attacks on Regulated Web Sites Arrive with Bitcoin Ransom Notes

Recent New Jersey DDoS attacks on unnamed regulated web sites had been along with a ransom note future that is promising more serious attacks should businesses not comply. (Image: rodin.com.au)

DDoS (distributed denial of service) is not a reality that any online video gaming company ever desires to cope with, but some regulated brand New Jersey sites had to do just that a week ago.

New Jersey’s fledgling online gambling industry has been targeted, apparently for the first time, by these distributed attacks.

Later week that is last at minimum four unnamed sites were derailed by a hacker, or hackers, who flooded the sites’ bandwidths with traffic, rendering them inoperable, and ultimately taking them offline for around half an hour.

The attacks were followed closely by a ransom note for a sum that is undisclosed payable in Bitcoin, with a threat of a more severe attack to follow.

Maybe Not Brand New, But Irritating

DDoS attacks aren’t anything new for the online gambling industry, of course. In fact, they’re as old as the industry it self, but there are suggestions that incidents for the unwanted actions have been growing. Some experts even claim that attacks across all online industries really doubled in 2014.

High-profile operators regarding the receiving end this past year included Betfair, which was targeted on Grand National day, the biggest UK horse race meet of the year with regards to betting.

Attackers usually time their efforts to coincide with large events that are sporting the hope that operators will simply pay up as opposed to lose business. PokerStars, Unibet, and state that is swedish monopoly Svenska Spel are also all recent victims.

Chances of Prosecution Slim

Regardless of the initial interruption, it appears that the situation is currently stable and has now been effectively dealt with by the New Jersey market’s cybersecurity teams. The battle between online gambling sites as well as the hackers is one of mouse and cat, of strategy and counterstrategy: as security technology improves, so do the hackers’ efforts to breach it.

New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement President David Rebuck said this that the matter was now being investigated by state police, the FBI, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, as well as his own organization week. The different agencies, he said, were hunting a ‘known actor’ who had ‘done this before.’

Chances of prosecution are slim, but. To date, only two guys have been convicted for launching DDoS attacks. Those were two UK-based Poles whom made the blunder of threatening an operator they knew personally and agreeing to meet up him in a hotel room. The operator, of course, brought the police with him. In 2013, the pair that is hapless sentenced to 5 years in prison by a court in great britain.

LVS Attack

Such attacks are not limited to online gambling, needless to say. In February 2014, Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVS), owned by anti-online curmudgeon Sheldon Adelson, was put through a massive cyber attack that was believed to own emanated from Iran. On February 10, LVS was plunged into chaos as computers started flatlining and servers shutting down. Hard disk drives were cleaned clean as malware ripped through the company’s networks.

The decision was taken to sever the multibillion dollar operation completely from the Internet as hackers began compressing and downloading batches of sensitive files, comprising everything from high-roller credit checks to details of global computer systems.

The attack caused an estimated $20 million worth of damage. The attackers subsequently claimed their DDoS actions had been been encouraged after hearing remarks made by Adelson in 2013 about ‘dropping the bomb’ on Iran.

NY Casino License Bidding Process Receives One Applicant

Tiago Downs, the bidder that is sole the fourth NY casino permit, proposes an improved expansion package having unsuccessful to impress last December. (Image: weny.com)

Regulators in nyc State have slim pickings if they come to decide regarding the winner associated with the 4th Upstate casino license in the economically deprived Southern Tier region.

Just one contender submitted a proposition for Monday’s deadline, while a rival pulled away at the minute that is last.

The Tioga Downs racino in Nichols may be the one and only applicant for the certain area, by having a $195 million expansion proposition to its present center.

The aborted proposal, from businessman Jeffrey C. Hyman, was pulled having been dealt ‘a fatal planet 7 oz casino blow’ by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation.

Hyman said his project would have been ‘seismic,’ which might have been what the environmental everyone was complaining about in the place that is first especially when you consider there is an ongoing debate about fracking within the area.


Unfortunately, Jeff Gural, owner of Tioga Downs, failed to impress the Gaming Control Board at the original certification hearing with his task in December 2014, although he has since come up by having an package that is improved.

In those days, the board recommended three casino licenses, for Monticello, into the Catskills; Schenectady; and the Finger Lakes area, snubbing the Southern Tier and Tioga Downs totally, despite having been given the powers to recommend a fourth license.

Gural was furious during the decision and highly critical of the board. He argued that the casino in the Southern Tier would be completely rational, as the closest competitor is Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, 90 miles south in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

‘It’s got nothing doing I have enough money,’ he fumed with me. ‘But the folks of the Southern Tier?’

‘And what really pisses me down,’ he continued, warming to his theme, ‘is the governor asked me personally to spend $800,000 of my cash to pass Local Law 1, Proposition One [on the expansion of casino gaming]. What was that all about? I mean… the thing that is whole sickening to tell the truth with you.’


Such ended up being the outcry among locals, in fact, that Governor Andrew Cuomo intervened, requesting that the Gaming Commission reconsider.

‘As this could be the license that is last in New York State, it might excite national competition by interested events that distribute better yet applications than the first round,’ suggested Cuomo. ‘ If you agree to the request, the [casino board] should quickly establish a procedure for the fourth license that could be complete as expeditiously as possible, as the Southern Tier needs jobs and investment now.’

The board complied, a decision it might probably now be sorry for, itself facing a ‘bidding war’ of one and under political pressure to award a license to a man who has recently been highly critical of its decision making processes as it finds.