Twas the Night for the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet
Day might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas? You can bet on it! (Image: zombieapocalypse.com)
Every year punters place bets on whether or not they’ll get up to a blanket that is snowy their roads on Christmas morning. Oahu is the old romantic in each of us that dreams intensely about this backdrop that is scenic a joyous day, surrounded by our liked ones and overeating with the Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and distributing our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?
Betting on Zombies
While many are wagering for a Christmas that is white bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering chances of 2000/1 on this Christmas being the beginning of the Zombie Apocalypse. That is clearly a nice, festive thought to possess, and beats the odds they offer for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League this year at 5000/1. Mention harmful gambling.
‘we are quite confident that the odds of a Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution over the Christmas period, they ought not to be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and eat the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.
Odds for a Christmas that is white currently at 5/1, which is a much better chance than those offered on the doomsday coming associated with the undead, and you are more likely in order to claim your winnings after a bit of snow instead of being forced to fight your way through the zombie hordes to gather your reward. Although you would certainly be pretty smug with yourself if you’ve got that bet right, that’s for certain.
While the opportunity to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is a lot more than probably a nice bit of publicity for Ladbrokes, Sean web Page zombie specialist and founder regarding the Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to organize for the worst.
‘The public is often interested in the chances of the white Christmas, however they should be more concerned by the increasing likelihood of a Zombie Apocalypse,’ claimed Page, suggesting, perhaps, that he’s nipping during the whiskey with a bit an excessive amount of alacrity.
‘The many likely time for an outbreak is during the busy festive season as people save money time in large groups, rendering it easier for the zombie virus to spread, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page added. Apparently, he’s seen it happen before.
Wagers That Are Dead On
2000/1 seems a bit too low for the likelihood of a zombie epidemic really, but this is not the first time Ladbrokes has offered the opportunity to place wagers on the Apocalypse, because they also offered the exact same odds regarding the outbreak of a undead siege on December 21st 2012, because of all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ‘enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in anticipation of these impending doom.
Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are additionally providing more likely odds of 500/1 on the chance for Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, but the smart profit this situation would most likely be regarding the zombies, despite the fact that you’d be unlikely to recoup any wager due to the, you realize, end of the entire world and all that. So less ‘nothing was stirring’ and more ‘watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead outside of the door.’
MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Still Must Okay
MGM Resorts is almost through the regulatory gauntlet in Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)
Just when you thought nobody would ever be good sufficient for Massachusetts’ insanely fastidious gaming payment, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative arm which could have its own TV series called ‘MGC P.I.’ recommended that MGM Resorts be found suitable to move forward with their Springfield casino task, with the caveat that MGM executives find a way to talk their way out of a few lingering issues for the commission, concerns that came to light as soon as the commission conducted its regulatory background check in the casino company.
Cleared for Lose
Once we say ‘lengthy’, we aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement spent yesteryear 10 months looking through every speck of dust that anyone associated with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they discovered nothing that would automatically disqualify the team from setting up house within the pristine state of Massachusetts.
But it is not really a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the word that is last whether or not MGM is going to be able to work inside their neck for the woods. But then be able to submit their last application as the one and only western Massachusetts casino license that will be given out; and since they’re the only remaining applicant, that would seem to be a pretty done deal if they give their papal blessing to the company, MGM will.
Truly the only tiny ding that the Bureau could find out after nearly a year of searching all documented in a 500-page report on this issue was MGM’s means of dealing previous executive board member Terry Christensen, whom in 2008 was convicted on costs involving the wiretapping of business mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian ended up being involved in a gruesome child help fight.
‘Despite his indictment, resignation from the Board and ultimate conviction, Christensen was permitted to interact, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in some sensitive and non-public corporate things of MGM Resorts … including their attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.
In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate using the Commission at this week’s hearing, noting that it absolutely was an error for the business to allow bad child Christensen to carry on in virtually any ability with the organization.
‘I exercised poor judgment,’ stated Murren, who was simply the outfit’s CFO when all this went down. ‘It was an idea that is bad the very beginning. None of us should have had any contact with (Christensen).’
Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.
More Executive Contrition
Murren wasn’t the only one to throw himself on the mercy associated with the court, as present MGM board member (and mind of its review committee) Roland Hernandez made a point to share with commissioners that protocols are now set up within the company to ensure there will be no repeats with this poor decision-making process.
All that has been then kept for the commish to deal with were a few concerns they had about some MGM transactions in Macau; mostly, these centered around a former partnership with Chinese business mogul (and child of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as a partner during a 2010 nj-new Jersey regulatory hearing on the problem, and also as such, MGM had to unload a 50 percent stake in an Atlantic City casino there, just to keep their nose clean. The allegations had been that Ho’s daddy Stanley had had transactions with some Chinese gangs, a definite ‘no-no’ in today’s regulatory video gaming universe.
Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been involved with MGM completely separate from her father, and that she was mainly involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been ok with the Ho interaction; specifically, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no nagging problem along with it. He additionally noted that New Jersey has now softened their stance that is own may enable MGM back in the fold in Atlantic City.
The panel should rule later this the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby won’t say which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness in dealing with these issues week.
But also being the only applicant and even in the event cleared by the commission this week, it’s still maybe not a 100 per cent slam-dunk for MGM Resorts.
‘One applicant or 10, we shall hold their feet to the fire to verify we have application that is really good’ Crosby recommended reporters throughout a hearing break.
Setback for PokerStars as brand New Jersey Bars Licensing for Two Years
PokerStars got a smack from nj regulators this when they put them in licensing limbo for the next two years week
If there is one name that has dominated the American on the web poker market over the last decade, it offers become PokerStars. However, if you’re residing in New Jersey, you shouldn’t expect you’ll be playing for a site operated by the poker giant any right time quickly.
Two Years in Limbo
The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement made the decision this week to suspend the overview of PokerStars’ application for an on-line gambling permit for couple of years, effectively locking the organization from the state’s internet poker marketplace for that time period.
‘The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the application of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino service industry licensure (CSIE) will likely be held in a suspended status for a period of two years,’ the Division said in a declaration.
However, the door is not completely closed on PokerStars.
‘The Division, within that duration, may think about a request for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, at which time the Division’s research of PokerStars and its own entities that are affiliated associated individuals will likely be resumed to evaluate suitability.’
Bad Company, Bad Actor
Although PokerStars has long settled its case with the government and admitted no wrongdoing as a part of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have actually some problems with the company. Chief among those appears to be their relationship with founder Isai Scheinberg, that has been under federal indictment since Black Friday. Scheinberg isn’t U.S. citizen, and have not come to your U.S. to face those fees, to no one’s surprise.
While this is a huge loss for PokerStars, it also marks an enormous win because of its competitors in the nj-new Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently possesses 50 percent share of the state’s poker market, using the Caesars/888 World number of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could effortlessly have been overshadowed by the PokerStars site which will were operated in conjunction with Resorts Casino and had been hoping that their mind start would give them an edge that allows them to keep competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to develop brand name loyalty, a thing that PokerStars might have a difficult time overcoming, if and when they are finally licensed for New Jersey’s online marketplace.
PokerStars ended up being predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that hawaii’s decision could improvement in the long term.
‘Our company is disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this right time,’ said PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ‘We note that the DGE will resume the review of our application if our circumstances change. We shall stay in open discussion with the DGE and certainly will update them on alterations in our situation winner club casino no deposit bonus because they occur.’
This wasn’t the very first result that is disappointing PokerStars in nj-new jersey. Previously, the company had tried to buy the Atlantic Club Casino, just to have that deal fall apart over questions about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That decision was also costly, as PokerStars lost about $11 million they’d spent on casino expenses a total that was meant to be used to your eventual $15 million price.